<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 19 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36850</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving entitlement to deductions under Sections 84 and 80J for the assessment years 1967-68 and 1968-69. The Court held that the units established by the assessee qualified as new industrial undertakings and were entitled to relief under the Income-tax Act. Additionally, the Court determined that the denial of development rebate by the Tribunal was incorrect, and the assessee was entitled to the rebate based on valid instructions from the Central Board of Direct Taxes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:24:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 19 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36850</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving entitlement to deductions under Sections 84 and 80J for the assessment years 1967-68 and 1968-69. The Court held that the units established by the assessee qualified as new industrial undertakings and were entitled to relief under the Income-tax Act. Additionally, the Court determined that the denial of development rebate by the Tribunal was incorrect, and the assessee was entitled to the rebate based on valid instructions from the Central Board of Direct Taxes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>