https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314170 Writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate where the Wakf Act provides a complete statutory mechanism before the Tribunal and a revisional remedy under the proviso to Section 83(9). That remedy was treated as an effective alternative remedy, and no recognised exception was shown, such as lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice, or any similar ground to bypass the statutory route. On that basis, the writ petition was not maintainable and was liable to be dismissed in limine. en-us Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 May 2024 10:57:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314170 Writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate where the Wakf Act provides a complete statutory mechanism before the Tribunal and a revisional remedy under the proviso to Section 83(9). That remedy was treated as an effective alternative remedy, and no recognised exception was shown, such as lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice, or any similar ground to bypass the statutory route. On that basis, the writ petition was not maintainable and was liable to be dismissed in limine. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314170