<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (11) TMI 68 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36847</link>
    <description>Section 84 relief was available on a partner&#039;s share of firm income from an industrial undertaking even though the firm had already obtained the benefit, because the relevant version of the Act contained no prohibition against such concurrent relief. The later insertion of section 80A(3) was treated as a subsequent change aimed at preventing double deduction, supporting the view that the earlier scheme did not bar relief at both levels. The assessee was therefore entitled to the deduction on distributive share income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:19:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (11) TMI 68 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36847</link>
      <description>Section 84 relief was available on a partner&#039;s share of firm income from an industrial undertaking even though the firm had already obtained the benefit, because the relevant version of the Act contained no prohibition against such concurrent relief. The later insertion of section 80A(3) was treated as a subsequent change aimed at preventing double deduction, supporting the view that the earlier scheme did not bar relief at both levels. The assessee was therefore entitled to the deduction on distributive share income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>