<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1040 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752987</link>
    <description>HC found the retrospective GST registration cancellation procedurally flawed. The court modified the cancellation order to align with the actual business closure date, directing compliance with tax regulations. While allowing potential tax recovery, the judgment emphasized the need for objective reasons in administrative actions and upheld principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1040 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752987</link>
      <description>HC found the retrospective GST registration cancellation procedurally flawed. The court modified the cancellation order to align with the actual business closure date, directing compliance with tax regulations. While allowing potential tax recovery, the judgment emphasized the need for objective reasons in administrative actions and upheld principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>