<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1033 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752980</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax assessment order. Petitioner failed to file appeal within extended statutory period prescribed by SC during pandemic. Court held that extraordinary remedy under Article 226 cannot be invoked when statutory appellate remedy remains unexplored, citing precedent that emphasizes procedural compliance and exhaustion of alternative legal mechanisms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1033 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752980</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax assessment order. Petitioner failed to file appeal within extended statutory period prescribed by SC during pandemic. Court held that extraordinary remedy under Article 226 cannot be invoked when statutory appellate remedy remains unexplored, citing precedent that emphasizes procedural compliance and exhaustion of alternative legal mechanisms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>