https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752978 GST on royalty paid to the State Mining Department was challenged on writ, but the High Court declined interference because the same controversy had already been decided against the petitioner's position in earlier Division Bench orders. The Court noted that counsel could not distinguish those precedents, and applied stare decisis to follow them. On that basis, the writ petition and the connected stay petition were dismissed in terms of the cited Division Bench rulings, leaving the levy undisturbed. en-us Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 May 2024 16:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752978 GST on royalty paid to the State Mining Department was challenged on writ, but the High Court declined interference because the same controversy had already been decided against the petitioner's position in earlier Division Bench orders. The Court noted that counsel could not distinguish those precedents, and applied stare decisis to follow them. On that basis, the writ petition and the connected stay petition were dismissed in terms of the cited Division Bench rulings, leaving the levy undisturbed. Case-Laws GST Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752978