<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal Dismissed: Court Affirms TDS Deposit Starts New Limitation Period; Factual Claim Rejected as Untimely.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77657</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the findings of the Single Judge on the limitation period for a suit. The appellant did not dispute the legal findings that the deposit of TDS triggers a fresh limitation period u/s 19 of the Act of 1963. The appellant raised a factual dispute regarding a transaction reflected in the TDS certificate, claiming it pertained to a separate transaction. The court rejected this claim as it was not raised before the Single Judge. The court held that the Single Judge&#039;s conclusion based on the TDS certificate was in line with the evidence and law. The court dismissed the appeal and pending applications, affirming the Single Judge&#039;s decision on the limitation issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 06:57:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 06:57:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal Dismissed: Court Affirms TDS Deposit Starts New Limitation Period; Factual Claim Rejected as Untimely.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77657</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the findings of the Single Judge on the limitation period for a suit. The appellant did not dispute the legal findings that the deposit of TDS triggers a fresh limitation period u/s 19 of the Act of 1963. The appellant raised a factual dispute regarding a transaction reflected in the TDS certificate, claiming it pertained to a separate transaction. The court rejected this claim as it was not raised before the Single Judge. The court held that the Single Judge&#039;s conclusion based on the TDS certificate was in line with the evidence and law. The court dismissed the appeal and pending applications, affirming the Single Judge&#039;s decision on the limitation issue.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 06:57:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>