<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1026 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752973</link>
    <description>A Delhi HC decision considered whether deposit of tax deducted at source on 30 September 2015 extended limitation under Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963 in a suit arising from a deed of cancellation. The Court held that the decisive question was whether the TDS reflected in the certificate related to the same liability and amounted to a payment on account of the debt. As the appellant did not plead any separate transactions to which the deposit was referable, and the statutory scheme under Sections 194A and 198 of the Income-tax Act supported the certificate, the TDS deposit was treated as payment on account of the debt. The limitation objection therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 20:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1026 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752973</link>
      <description>A Delhi HC decision considered whether deposit of tax deducted at source on 30 September 2015 extended limitation under Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963 in a suit arising from a deed of cancellation. The Court held that the decisive question was whether the TDS reflected in the certificate related to the same liability and amounted to a payment on account of the debt. As the appellant did not plead any separate transactions to which the deposit was referable, and the statutory scheme under Sections 194A and 198 of the Income-tax Act supported the certificate, the TDS deposit was treated as payment on account of the debt. The limitation objection therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>