<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1019 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752966</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad upheld AO&#039;s determination that assessee was in default under Section 201(1) for non-deduction of TDS under Section 194IA on property purchases. Despite multiple adjournments, assessee failed to provide evidence supporting eligibility for First Proviso to Section 201(1) exemption. Tribunal confirmed liability for interest under Section 201(1A) until deductee filed return and upheld penalty under Section 271C for TDS non-compliance. Appeal dismissed against assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 06:57:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1019 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752966</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad upheld AO&#039;s determination that assessee was in default under Section 201(1) for non-deduction of TDS under Section 194IA on property purchases. Despite multiple adjournments, assessee failed to provide evidence supporting eligibility for First Proviso to Section 201(1) exemption. Tribunal confirmed liability for interest under Section 201(1A) until deductee filed return and upheld penalty under Section 271C for TDS non-compliance. Appeal dismissed against assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>