<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1012 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752959</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, overturning the orders dated 21.09.2020 and 31.03.2015, which had upheld the assessee&#039;s tax liability under section 201(1)/201(1A) for FY 2012-13/2013-14. The court determined the orders to be unsustainable, referencing legal principles from the Supreme Court and High Court judgments, ultimately concluding that the assessee was not obligated to deduct tax at source under section 194H.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1012 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752959</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, overturning the orders dated 21.09.2020 and 31.03.2015, which had upheld the assessee&#039;s tax liability under section 201(1)/201(1A) for FY 2012-13/2013-14. The court determined the orders to be unsustainable, referencing legal principles from the Supreme Court and High Court judgments, ultimately concluding that the assessee was not obligated to deduct tax at source under section 194H.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>