<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 999 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752946</link>
    <description>Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code can be applied where evidence shows a person was knowingly involved in fraudulent conduct to reduce the corporate debtor&#039;s recoverable dues. The application was supported by DRI search material, defective books of account, absence of matching inventory, and unexplained accounting entries that sharply reduced liabilities after the search. The Resolution Professional examined the seized material, reported it to the Committee of Creditors, and then filed the application, satisfying Regulation 35A. On those facts, the appellant was not treated as an unrelated third party, and the direction to contribute to the assets of the corporate debtor was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 20:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 999 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752946</link>
      <description>Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code can be applied where evidence shows a person was knowingly involved in fraudulent conduct to reduce the corporate debtor&#039;s recoverable dues. The application was supported by DRI search material, defective books of account, absence of matching inventory, and unexplained accounting entries that sharply reduced liabilities after the search. The Resolution Professional examined the seized material, reported it to the Committee of Creditors, and then filed the application, satisfying Regulation 35A. On those facts, the appellant was not treated as an unrelated third party, and the direction to contribute to the assets of the corporate debtor was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>