<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 982 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752929</link>
    <description>Renewal of an L-10BB liquor licence could not be refused solely because the licence had earlier operated from a branch, where the petitioner&#039;s GST registration was amended before expiry and the amendment took effect from the date of application under Rule 19 of the Himachal Pradesh Goods &amp; Services Tax Rules, 2017. The amended registration supported the claim that the premises had become the principal place of business. Rule 19-A of the Himachal Pradesh Liquor License Rules, 1986 governed renewal and did not permit rejection on the stated distance condition from an L-2 vend. Excise Policy conditions could not override the statutory rules, so the renewal refusal was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 982 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752929</link>
      <description>Renewal of an L-10BB liquor licence could not be refused solely because the licence had earlier operated from a branch, where the petitioner&#039;s GST registration was amended before expiry and the amendment took effect from the date of application under Rule 19 of the Himachal Pradesh Goods &amp; Services Tax Rules, 2017. The amended registration supported the claim that the premises had become the principal place of business. Rule 19-A of the Himachal Pradesh Liquor License Rules, 1986 governed renewal and did not permit rejection on the stated distance condition from an L-2 vend. Excise Policy conditions could not override the statutory rules, so the renewal refusal was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>