https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314167 The SC, with Hon'ble Justices presiding, addressed the interpretation of Note 2(a) of the General Rules of Interpretation. The Petitioner was represented, while the Respondent was not. The Court condoned the delay and concluded that no substantial question of law was present, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. en-us Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 May 2024 19:54:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314167 The SC, with Hon'ble Justices presiding, addressed the interpretation of Note 2(a) of the General Rules of Interpretation. The Petitioner was represented, while the Respondent was not. The Court condoned the delay and concluded that no substantial question of law was present, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314167