<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (6) TMI 5 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36835</link>
    <description>Tax liability on concealed income arose when the income was earned, and voluntary disclosure did not extinguish that existing obligation. Although the amount paid under section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965 was not taxed under the normal charging provisions, it was treated as income-tax paid in lieu of the ordinary charge and therefore stood on the same footing for wealth-tax purposes. As the liability existed on the relevant valuation dates, the amount was deductible as a debt owed under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:28:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (6) TMI 5 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36835</link>
      <description>Tax liability on concealed income arose when the income was earned, and voluntary disclosure did not extinguish that existing obligation. Although the amount paid under section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965 was not taxed under the normal charging provisions, it was treated as income-tax paid in lieu of the ordinary charge and therefore stood on the same footing for wealth-tax purposes. As the liability existed on the relevant valuation dates, the amount was deductible as a debt owed under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>