https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314160 The HC disposed of the writ petition, directing the 1st respondent to address the petitioner's representation concerning the H Forms in accordance with the law and established precedents. The court did not impose any costs and ordered the closure of any pending miscellaneous petitions. The petitioner's request for a Writ of Mandamus was acknowledged, but no substantive relief was granted beyond the directive for reconsideration. en-us Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 May 2024 18:01:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314160 The HC disposed of the writ petition, directing the 1st respondent to address the petitioner's representation concerning the H Forms in accordance with the law and established precedents. The court did not impose any costs and ordered the closure of any pending miscellaneous petitions. The petitioner's request for a Writ of Mandamus was acknowledged, but no substantive relief was granted beyond the directive for reconsideration. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314160