https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314163 Review jurisdiction under Article 137, Section 114, Order XLVII Rule 1 and the Supreme Court Rules is confined to a patent error, discovery of new matter, or analogous sufficient cause. A review court cannot sit in appeal over its own judgment, reargue issues already considered, or entertain a claim that depends on extended reasoning to show error. The grounds raised were treated as having been examined in the earlier judgment, and the petitions were found to be an attempt to obtain a different view on the merits. No case for review was made out and the petitions were not maintainable on the asserted grounds. en-us Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 May 2024 18:01:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314163 Review jurisdiction under Article 137, Section 114, Order XLVII Rule 1 and the Supreme Court Rules is confined to a patent error, discovery of new matter, or analogous sufficient cause. A review court cannot sit in appeal over its own judgment, reargue issues already considered, or entertain a claim that depends on extended reasoning to show error. The grounds raised were treated as having been examined in the earlier judgment, and the petitions were found to be an attempt to obtain a different view on the merits. No case for review was made out and the petitions were not maintainable on the asserted grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314163