<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 969 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752916</link>
    <description>HC quashed the impugned tax demand order against petitioner, directing respondent to issue fresh order within 60 days. Petitioner was granted 30 days to respond to original notices regarding tax discrepancies for July 2017-March 2018 period. The case was remitted for reconsideration without imposing costs, emphasizing procedural fairness in tax proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 969 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752916</link>
      <description>HC quashed the impugned tax demand order against petitioner, directing respondent to issue fresh order within 60 days. Petitioner was granted 30 days to respond to original notices regarding tax discrepancies for July 2017-March 2018 period. The case was remitted for reconsideration without imposing costs, emphasizing procedural fairness in tax proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>