https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752885 The HC reserved judgment after hearing arguments on the interpretation of section 2(u) of the PMLA Act concerning whether forcible possession of landed property constitutes proceeds of crime. The petitioner argued the absence of a predicate offence and insufficient evidence for guilt under the PMLA Act, challenging the Enforcement Directorate's case. en-us Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 May 2024 08:20:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752885 The HC reserved judgment after hearing arguments on the interpretation of section 2(u) of the PMLA Act concerning whether forcible possession of landed property constitutes proceeds of crime. The petitioner argued the absence of a predicate offence and insufficient evidence for guilt under the PMLA Act, challenging the Enforcement Directorate's case. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752885