<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 935 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752882</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed Civil Appeal No. 9146 of 2011, applying the law established in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. For Civil Appeal No. 6219-6220 of 2012, the Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the duty demand. The Court noted that the impugned judgment had already set aside the penalty and duty demand beyond the normal period, and directed consequential actions to follow.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 935 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752882</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed Civil Appeal No. 9146 of 2011, applying the law established in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. For Civil Appeal No. 6219-6220 of 2012, the Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the duty demand. The Court noted that the impugned judgment had already set aside the penalty and duty demand beyond the normal period, and directed consequential actions to follow.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>