<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 918 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752865</link>
    <description>HC ruled that an order under CGST Act Section 74(9) was invalid due to violation of procedural law. The court found that the Deputy Commissioner failed to provide the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing as mandated by Section 75(4), thereby breaching principles of natural justice. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted back for fresh adjudication with proper hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 918 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752865</link>
      <description>HC ruled that an order under CGST Act Section 74(9) was invalid due to violation of procedural law. The court found that the Deputy Commissioner failed to provide the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing as mandated by Section 75(4), thereby breaching principles of natural justice. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted back for fresh adjudication with proper hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>