<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 917 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752864</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging appeal rejection. Court interpreted Rule 108 of CGST Rules flexibly, emphasizing that technical non-compliance in submitting self-certified copy should not invalidate electronic appeal. Drawing from precedents, the court directed appellate authority to rehear appeals on merits within three months, quashing the original dismissal order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 917 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752864</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging appeal rejection. Court interpreted Rule 108 of CGST Rules flexibly, emphasizing that technical non-compliance in submitting self-certified copy should not invalidate electronic appeal. Drawing from precedents, the court directed appellate authority to rehear appeals on merits within three months, quashing the original dismissal order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>