https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752847 Writ petitions challenged an NFRA final order and the validity of related statutory provisions, but the Delhi HC limited the interim stage to whether any protective order was justified. On the material before it, and having regard to NFRA's findings on audit failures and related misconduct, the Court found no basis to grant interim protection. Interim relief was therefore refused, leaving the petitioners to pursue the substantive challenge without interim restraint on the NFRA action. en-us Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 19 May 2024 21:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752847 Writ petitions challenged an NFRA final order and the validity of related statutory provisions, but the Delhi HC limited the interim stage to whether any protective order was justified. On the material before it, and having regard to NFRA's findings on audit failures and related misconduct, the Court found no basis to grant interim protection. Interim relief was therefore refused, leaving the petitioners to pursue the substantive challenge without interim restraint on the NFRA action. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752847