https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314131 NCLAT New Delhi rejected an application for condonation of 38-day delay in filing appeal after dismissal of application under section 7 as non-maintainable. The tribunal held that conditions under section 14 of Limitation Act were not attracted to extend benefit to appellant. Distinguished SC judgments in Sesh Nath Singh and Laxmi Srinivasa cases, noting those involved different factual situations where section 14 benefits were extended due to jurisdictional issues in SARFAESI proceedings and writ petitions respectively. NCLAT concluded appellant not entitled to section 14 benefit and jurisdiction to condone delay limited to 15 days only, rejecting the condonation application. en-us Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 19 May 2024 08:09:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314131 NCLAT New Delhi rejected an application for condonation of 38-day delay in filing appeal after dismissal of application under section 7 as non-maintainable. The tribunal held that conditions under section 14 of Limitation Act were not attracted to extend benefit to appellant. Distinguished SC judgments in Sesh Nath Singh and Laxmi Srinivasa cases, noting those involved different factual situations where section 14 benefits were extended due to jurisdictional issues in SARFAESI proceedings and writ petitions respectively. NCLAT concluded appellant not entitled to section 14 benefit and jurisdiction to condone delay limited to 15 days only, rejecting the condonation application. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314131