https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314134 Section 91 CrPC does not ordinarily support an accused's request to summon additional documents at the prosecution evidence stage unless necessity or desirability for that stage is shown. The court noted that such requests are usually more appropriate at the defence stage, and that the petitioner had already been given access to earlier identified documents. Because the further material sought related to another case concerning the complainant, not the prosecution case against the petitioner, no basis was shown to interfere with the trial court's refusal. The petition failed, while liberty was left open to seek appropriate relief at the defence stage in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 19 May 2024 08:09:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314134 Section 91 CrPC does not ordinarily support an accused's request to summon additional documents at the prosecution evidence stage unless necessity or desirability for that stage is shown. The court noted that such requests are usually more appropriate at the defence stage, and that the petitioner had already been given access to earlier identified documents. Because the further material sought related to another case concerning the complainant, not the prosecution case against the petitioner, no basis was shown to interfere with the trial court's refusal. The petition failed, while liberty was left open to seek appropriate relief at the defence stage in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314134