https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314130 A writ petition under Article 226 is ordinarily not maintainable to enforce disputed monetary claims arising from a non-statutory contract where liability depends on contested measurements, factual verification and the genuineness of survey material. The existence of an agreed dispute-resolution clause, including arbitration, points the parties to the contractual forum rather than writ jurisdiction, and the High Court should not fix liability on disputed facts. The passage of time did not create an enforceable right to bypass the contractual mechanism, so the claimant had to pursue the agreed forum for determination of the payment claim. en-us Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 19 May 2024 08:07:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314130 A writ petition under Article 226 is ordinarily not maintainable to enforce disputed monetary claims arising from a non-statutory contract where liability depends on contested measurements, factual verification and the genuineness of survey material. The existence of an agreed dispute-resolution clause, including arbitration, points the parties to the contractual forum rather than writ jurisdiction, and the High Court should not fix liability on disputed facts. The passage of time did not create an enforceable right to bypass the contractual mechanism, so the claimant had to pursue the agreed forum for determination of the payment claim. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314130