<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Orders Return of Seized Gold, Criticizes Department for Withholding Favorable Evidence in Customs Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77521</link>
    <description>Smuggling - seizure of foreign origin gold bars - Burden of proof u/s 123 - Reliability of statements recorded u/s 108 - The Tribunal scrutinized the documents provided by the respondents, including invoices, stock registers, and GST returns, which were verified by the Customs authorities. The documents substantiated the respondents&#039; claims of lawful procurement and transfer of gold. The Tribunal noted the Department&#039;s failure to disclose crucial follow-up reports from Kolkata Customs that supported the respondents&#039; case. The Tribunal concluded that the respondents successfully discharged their burden of proof, and the seized gold was of Indian origin and legally possessed. - The appeals filed by the Department are dismissed. The Commissioner is directed to return the seized gold or its sale proceeds along with interest as per rules within six weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2024 12:04:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2024 12:06:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Orders Return of Seized Gold, Criticizes Department for Withholding Favorable Evidence in Customs Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77521</link>
      <description>Smuggling - seizure of foreign origin gold bars - Burden of proof u/s 123 - Reliability of statements recorded u/s 108 - The Tribunal scrutinized the documents provided by the respondents, including invoices, stock registers, and GST returns, which were verified by the Customs authorities. The documents substantiated the respondents&#039; claims of lawful procurement and transfer of gold. The Tribunal noted the Department&#039;s failure to disclose crucial follow-up reports from Kolkata Customs that supported the respondents&#039; case. The Tribunal concluded that the respondents successfully discharged their burden of proof, and the seized gold was of Indian origin and legally possessed. - The appeals filed by the Department are dismissed. The Commissioner is directed to return the seized gold or its sale proceeds along with interest as per rules within six weeks.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2024 12:04:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>