<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 877 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752824</link>
    <description>An appellate order under the West Bengal GST Act was set aside for breach of natural justice because the demand rested on a foundational report that had not been furnished to the petitioner. The court held that, where such material forms the basis of adjudication, fairness requires disclosure so the affected party can effectively meet it. The appeal was directed to be reheard after supplying the report to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2024 07:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 877 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752824</link>
      <description>An appellate order under the West Bengal GST Act was set aside for breach of natural justice because the demand rested on a foundational report that had not been furnished to the petitioner. The court held that, where such material forms the basis of adjudication, fairness requires disclosure so the affected party can effectively meet it. The appeal was directed to be reheard after supplying the report to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>