https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752814 Cancellation of registration was held unsustainable where the order gave inconsistent treatment to the reply, lacked meaningful reasons, and showed non-application of mind. The appellate order did not cure these defects. The court reiterated that an adverse quasi-judicial order affecting business rights must disclose reasons and reflect fair consideration to satisfy Article 14. Because the original order was non-speaking and the petitioner had not received a proper opportunity to contest the notice, the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after consideration of the reply and hearing the petitioner. en-us Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 May 2024 15:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752814 Cancellation of registration was held unsustainable where the order gave inconsistent treatment to the reply, lacked meaningful reasons, and showed non-application of mind. The appellate order did not cure these defects. The court reiterated that an adverse quasi-judicial order affecting business rights must disclose reasons and reflect fair consideration to satisfy Article 14. Because the original order was non-speaking and the petitioner had not received a proper opportunity to contest the notice, the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after consideration of the reply and hearing the petitioner. Case-Laws GST Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752814