https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752782 A notification amending the export policy was treated as validly issued by the Central Government because it expressly invoked Sections 3 and 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 and was published in the Gazette, so the authority challenge failed. However, the exclusion of non-basmati rice exporters from the transitional protection in paragraph 1.05 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2023 was held unsustainable where no cogent reasons or material justified denying relief to existing commitments. The note treats this as contrary to legitimate expectation, Article 14 non-arbitrariness, and the requirement of reasonable restriction under Article 19(1)(g). en-us Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jan 2026 13:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752782 A notification amending the export policy was treated as validly issued by the Central Government because it expressly invoked Sections 3 and 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 and was published in the Gazette, so the authority challenge failed. However, the exclusion of non-basmati rice exporters from the transitional protection in paragraph 1.05 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2023 was held unsustainable where no cogent reasons or material justified denying relief to existing commitments. The note treats this as contrary to legitimate expectation, Article 14 non-arbitrariness, and the requirement of reasonable restriction under Article 19(1)(g). Case-Laws Customs Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752782