<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1632 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314110</link>
    <description>In an NDPS prosecution involving commercial quantity, bail on a second application was refused because the statutory bar under Section 37 controlled the matter. The Court noted that bail could be granted only if the twin conditions were satisfied: reasonable grounds to believe the accused was not guilty and that he was not likely to commit an offence while on bail. It held that parity could not be claimed from an earlier bail order that did not properly apply the mandatory Section 37 test, and that prolonged incarceration alone could not override the statutory restriction. The second bail application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2024 00:02:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1632 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314110</link>
      <description>In an NDPS prosecution involving commercial quantity, bail on a second application was refused because the statutory bar under Section 37 controlled the matter. The Court noted that bail could be granted only if the twin conditions were satisfied: reasonable grounds to believe the accused was not guilty and that he was not likely to commit an offence while on bail. It held that parity could not be claimed from an earlier bail order that did not properly apply the mandatory Section 37 test, and that prolonged incarceration alone could not override the statutory restriction. The second bail application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>