<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 787 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314107</link>
    <description>Section 91 CrPC permits summons for documents only when their production is shown to be necessary or desirable for a just decision; an accused need not disclose the defence, but must still indicate the circumstances showing relevance. A vague claim that documents may reveal the truth is insufficient. The court also noted that the case diary of the same case cannot be summoned because Section 172(3) bars it, while another case diary may be called only on a proper showing of necessity. As the requests for Section 107 proceedings, medical records, and the case diary were either unsupported by particulars or already supplied, the accused failed to justify summoning the records and the revision was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 17:12:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 787 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314107</link>
      <description>Section 91 CrPC permits summons for documents only when their production is shown to be necessary or desirable for a just decision; an accused need not disclose the defence, but must still indicate the circumstances showing relevance. A vague claim that documents may reveal the truth is insufficient. The court also noted that the case diary of the same case cannot be summoned because Section 172(3) bars it, while another case diary may be called only on a proper showing of necessity. As the requests for Section 107 proceedings, medical records, and the case diary were either unsupported by particulars or already supplied, the accused failed to justify summoning the records and the revision was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>