<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Sub-contractors liable for Service Tax despite main contractor payment; Tribunal rejects extended limitation period for ambiguity.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77514</link>
    <description>Liability to pay Service Tax when the main contractor has already paid - The Tribunal cited a circular stating sub-contractors are liable to pay Service Tax separately. However, they ruled the extended limitation period couldn&#039;t be invoked due to ambiguity during the relevant period. Regarding the normal limitation period, they upheld the demand for October 2010 to March 2011. They rejected the appellant&#039;s argument based on a Supreme Court case and noted that the demand for this period wasn&#039;t dead. Ultimately, they confirmed the demand for the normal period but set aside the extended period demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 11:42:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 11:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Sub-contractors liable for Service Tax despite main contractor payment; Tribunal rejects extended limitation period for ambiguity.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77514</link>
      <description>Liability to pay Service Tax when the main contractor has already paid - The Tribunal cited a circular stating sub-contractors are liable to pay Service Tax separately. However, they ruled the extended limitation period couldn&#039;t be invoked due to ambiguity during the relevant period. Regarding the normal limitation period, they upheld the demand for October 2010 to March 2011. They rejected the appellant&#039;s argument based on a Supreme Court case and noted that the demand for this period wasn&#039;t dead. Ultimately, they confirmed the demand for the normal period but set aside the extended period demand.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 11:42:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>