<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 1148 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314098</link>
    <description>The petitioner challenged a notification by the Central Government on anti-dumping duty under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The SC clarified that the Designated Authority&#039;s order is recommendatory, and the appeal lies with the Central Government&#039;s determination. The Court stayed the subsequent notification, directing payment under protest per the earlier notification, pending a hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 1148 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314098</link>
      <description>The petitioner challenged a notification by the Central Government on anti-dumping duty under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The SC clarified that the Designated Authority&#039;s order is recommendatory, and the appeal lies with the Central Government&#039;s determination. The Court stayed the subsequent notification, directing payment under protest per the earlier notification, pending a hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>