<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 825 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752772</link>
    <description>The HC ruled that notifications did not extend the Joint Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction beyond their designated area. The court restrained respondents from taking coercive action against the petitioner, finding the impugned order lacked proper jurisdictional authority under Section 73 of the GST Act. The matter was listed for further proceedings with instructions to complete pleadings promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 825 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752772</link>
      <description>The HC ruled that notifications did not extend the Joint Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction beyond their designated area. The court restrained respondents from taking coercive action against the petitioner, finding the impugned order lacked proper jurisdictional authority under Section 73 of the GST Act. The matter was listed for further proceedings with instructions to complete pleadings promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>