<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (11) TMI 58 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36795</link>
    <description>The Tribunal was justified in allowing the assessee to claim a deduction of Rs. 2,87,500 related to debenture discounts. However, the court ruled that there was no actual expenditure of Rs. 2,87,500, and therefore, it could not be considered as revenue expenditure. The court emphasized that the accounting treatment of the discount did not change the fundamental nature of the transaction, leading to the disallowance of the claimed amount as revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:57:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (11) TMI 58 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36795</link>
      <description>The Tribunal was justified in allowing the assessee to claim a deduction of Rs. 2,87,500 related to debenture discounts. However, the court ruled that there was no actual expenditure of Rs. 2,87,500, and therefore, it could not be considered as revenue expenditure. The court emphasized that the accounting treatment of the discount did not change the fundamental nature of the transaction, leading to the disallowance of the claimed amount as revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>