https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752747 CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal regarding area-based exemption under Notification No. 49-50/2003-CE. The Tribunal relied on its previous decision in the appellant's own case, which held that the appellant was entitled to benefit of Notification No. 50/2003-CE for the period 20.06.2009 to 21.03.2010. The subsequent demand of duty, interest and penalty for the period 18.06.2009 to 21.03.2010 was found unsustainable in law. The impugned order was set aside with consequential relief. en-us Tue, 14 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 May 2024 11:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752747 CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal regarding area-based exemption under Notification No. 49-50/2003-CE. The Tribunal relied on its previous decision in the appellant's own case, which held that the appellant was entitled to benefit of Notification No. 50/2003-CE for the period 20.06.2009 to 21.03.2010. The subsequent demand of duty, interest and penalty for the period 18.06.2009 to 21.03.2010 was found unsustainable in law. The impugned order was set aside with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752747