<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 797 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752744</link>
    <description>An assessment framed in the name of a company already struck off from the Registrar of Companies is jurisdictionally defective and cannot be sustained. Where the record shows that the Assessing Officer knew of the striking off during the pendency of the proceedings, the assessment against the non-existent entity remains invalid. The proceedings were quashed as having been initiated and completed against a company that no longer existed in law, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 08:32:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 797 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752744</link>
      <description>An assessment framed in the name of a company already struck off from the Registrar of Companies is jurisdictionally defective and cannot be sustained. Where the record shows that the Assessing Officer knew of the striking off during the pendency of the proceedings, the assessment against the non-existent entity remains invalid. The proceedings were quashed as having been initiated and completed against a company that no longer existed in law, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>