https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314093 Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act bars bail where, on the case diary or Section 173 CrPC report, the Court finds reasonable grounds to believe the accusation is prima facie true. Applying that standard, the High Court noted prima facie material against the accused, including prior UAPA involvement, co-accused disclosure statements referring to his presence in meetings, recovery of mobile phones linked to co-accused, and information said to be furnished under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. On that material, the statutory embargo operated and bail was refused. en-us Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 May 2024 02:34:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314093 Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act bars bail where, on the case diary or Section 173 CrPC report, the Court finds reasonable grounds to believe the accusation is prima facie true. Applying that standard, the High Court noted prima facie material against the accused, including prior UAPA involvement, co-accused disclosure statements referring to his presence in meetings, recovery of mobile phones linked to co-accused, and information said to be furnished under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. On that material, the statutory embargo operated and bail was refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314093