https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314087 Appointment to the post of Headmaster was treated as invalid because the candidate did not possess the statutory training qualification required under the 1978 Rules; the court stated that a B.Ed. degree was not enough, and later amendments or notifications could not retrospectively validate an appointment that was void when made. The challenge to the termination and approval orders on natural justice grounds also failed because breach of hearing requirements does not by itself vitiate administrative action where no prejudice is shown and the admitted facts permit only one lawful conclusion. The writ petition was therefore unsuccessful. en-us Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 May 2024 18:56:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314087 Appointment to the post of Headmaster was treated as invalid because the candidate did not possess the statutory training qualification required under the 1978 Rules; the court stated that a B.Ed. degree was not enough, and later amendments or notifications could not retrospectively validate an appointment that was void when made. The challenge to the termination and approval orders on natural justice grounds also failed because breach of hearing requirements does not by itself vitiate administrative action where no prejudice is shown and the admitted facts permit only one lawful conclusion. The writ petition was therefore unsuccessful. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314087