<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Premature Complaint Doesn&#039;t Bar Subsequent Filing for Cheque Dishonor Under Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77498</link>
    <description>Dishonour of Cheque - whether filing of a premature complaint debars, filing of a fresh complaint when the time becomes ripe to file the complaint? - The High Court, referring the decision of supreme court held that the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands on a different footing compared to other penal offences, and filing a second complaint is not barred if the first was filed prematurely. The court found no merit in the petitioner&#039;s arguments for quashing the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No.568 of 2021. It upheld the validity of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate&#039;s decision to take cognizance of the offence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 16:22:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 16:22:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Premature Complaint Doesn&#039;t Bar Subsequent Filing for Cheque Dishonor Under Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77498</link>
      <description>Dishonour of Cheque - whether filing of a premature complaint debars, filing of a fresh complaint when the time becomes ripe to file the complaint? - The High Court, referring the decision of supreme court held that the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands on a different footing compared to other penal offences, and filing a second complaint is not barred if the first was filed prematurely. The court found no merit in the petitioner&#039;s arguments for quashing the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No.568 of 2021. It upheld the validity of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate&#039;s decision to take cognizance of the offence.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 16:22:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>