<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 884 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314077</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the fourth recruitment criterion for peons, deeming it unreasonable and arbitrary, as it disqualified candidates with education above Standard VII. The Court emphasized that higher qualifications should not preclude eligibility. Existing appointments from the select list remained undisturbed, and the appeal was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 12:18:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 884 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314077</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the fourth recruitment criterion for peons, deeming it unreasonable and arbitrary, as it disqualified candidates with education above Standard VII. The Court emphasized that higher qualifications should not preclude eligibility. Existing appointments from the select list remained undisturbed, and the appeal was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>