https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314078 Bachelor of Education and L.T. qualifications were not treated as equivalent to the prescribed B.T.C. qualification for appointment as Assistant Teachers in Junior Basic Schools. The relevant service rules required specific training for primary-level teaching, and the court accepted that such qualifications were meant for different teaching levels. The challenge based on Article 14 also failed because the separate treatment of teachers for hill areas was held to rest on a reasonable classification, given that those conditions were not comparable to those in the plains. en-us Tue, 29 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 May 2024 12:18:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314078 Bachelor of Education and L.T. qualifications were not treated as equivalent to the prescribed B.T.C. qualification for appointment as Assistant Teachers in Junior Basic Schools. The relevant service rules required specific training for primary-level teaching, and the court accepted that such qualifications were meant for different teaching levels. The challenge based on Article 14 also failed because the separate treatment of teachers for hill areas was held to rest on a reasonable classification, given that those conditions were not comparable to those in the plains. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314078