<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 773 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752720</link>
    <description>The Calcutta HC ruled that appellate authorities under the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 have jurisdiction to condone delays beyond the prescribed one-month limitation period under Section 107(4). Following the Division Bench precedent in S.K. Chakraborty Sons and Supreme Court guidance, the court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies in absence of a non obstante clause or specific exclusion. The appellate authority erred in refusing to entertain the delay condonation application. Finding the petitioner&#039;s explanation satisfactory, the HC condoned the delay and restored the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 773 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752720</link>
      <description>The Calcutta HC ruled that appellate authorities under the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 have jurisdiction to condone delays beyond the prescribed one-month limitation period under Section 107(4). Following the Division Bench precedent in S.K. Chakraborty Sons and Supreme Court guidance, the court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies in absence of a non obstante clause or specific exclusion. The appellate authority erred in refusing to entertain the delay condonation application. Finding the petitioner&#039;s explanation satisfactory, the HC condoned the delay and restored the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>