<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 764 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752711</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, and held that the addition of Rs. 18,81,500/- to the assessee&#039;s income was unjustified. It determined that once the business was accepted as commission income, disputing the profit under Section 44AD was unwarranted, thus supporting the assessee&#039;s position on business receipts and application of Section 44AD.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 08:23:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 764 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752711</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, and held that the addition of Rs. 18,81,500/- to the assessee&#039;s income was unjustified. It determined that once the business was accepted as commission income, disputing the profit under Section 44AD was unwarranted, thus supporting the assessee&#039;s position on business receipts and application of Section 44AD.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>