https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752710 HC reviewed a GST penalty order challenging a vehicle number discrepancy in an e-way bill during stock transfer. Despite a minor error in vehicle registration details, the court found no tax evasion intent. The HC set aside the penalty order under Section 129, ruling the clerical mistake did not warrant punitive action, thereby providing relief to the taxpayer and emphasizing procedural fairness in tax compliance. en-us Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Apr 2025 17:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752710 HC reviewed a GST penalty order challenging a vehicle number discrepancy in an e-way bill during stock transfer. Despite a minor error in vehicle registration details, the court found no tax evasion intent. The HC set aside the penalty order under Section 129, ruling the clerical mistake did not warrant punitive action, thereby providing relief to the taxpayer and emphasizing procedural fairness in tax compliance. Case-Laws GST Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752710