<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 762 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752709</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the order under Section 148(A)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to insufficient response time for the petitioners. The notice under Section 148 was also annulled. The petitioners were granted two weeks to submit their reply, after which a new order would be issued. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 762 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752709</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the order under Section 148(A)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to insufficient response time for the petitioners. The notice under Section 148 was also annulled. The petitioners were granted two weeks to submit their reply, after which a new order would be issued. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>