<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 748 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752695</link>
    <description>HC disposed of writ petition challenging GST notice on seigniorage payment. Following precedent from Division Bench judgment, court directed petitioner to submit objections within four weeks and halted GST recovery until Nine Judge Constitution Bench decides royalty&#039;s nature. No costs were imposed, and related applications were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 748 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752695</link>
      <description>HC disposed of writ petition challenging GST notice on seigniorage payment. Following precedent from Division Bench judgment, court directed petitioner to submit objections within four weeks and halted GST recovery until Nine Judge Constitution Bench decides royalty&#039;s nature. No costs were imposed, and related applications were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>