<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 741 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752688</link>
    <description>Delhi HC set aside PCIT&#039;s order rejecting condonation of delay application under Section 119(2)(b) for income tax return filing. Court held PCIT failed to provide reasons or assess genuine hardship as required by CBDT Circular No. 9/2015. The order lacked reasoning and rationale, violating legislative mandate since PCIT acts as quasi-judicial body requiring reasoned decisions. Matter remanded to PCIT for fresh consideration in accordance with law and regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 08:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 741 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752688</link>
      <description>Delhi HC set aside PCIT&#039;s order rejecting condonation of delay application under Section 119(2)(b) for income tax return filing. Court held PCIT failed to provide reasons or assess genuine hardship as required by CBDT Circular No. 9/2015. The order lacked reasoning and rationale, violating legislative mandate since PCIT acts as quasi-judicial body requiring reasoned decisions. Matter remanded to PCIT for fresh consideration in accordance with law and regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>