<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 735 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752682</link>
    <description>Interest for delayed filing of GST returns cannot be demanded and recovered unilaterally where the taxpayer disputes the levy or quantification, because the GST scheme requires notice, hearing, and determination under the prescribed adjudicatory procedure. Although interest may accrue as a matter of liability on delayed payment, enforcement must follow statutory adjudication before recovery action is taken. Applying its earlier coordinate bench rulings, the Jharkhand HC held that a demand raised without prior adjudication was unsustainable, and the impugned demand, appellate order, and summary demand were set aside, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 07:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 735 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752682</link>
      <description>Interest for delayed filing of GST returns cannot be demanded and recovered unilaterally where the taxpayer disputes the levy or quantification, because the GST scheme requires notice, hearing, and determination under the prescribed adjudicatory procedure. Although interest may accrue as a matter of liability on delayed payment, enforcement must follow statutory adjudication before recovery action is taken. Applying its earlier coordinate bench rulings, the Jharkhand HC held that a demand raised without prior adjudication was unsustainable, and the impugned demand, appellate order, and summary demand were set aside, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>