https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77475 Money Laundering - Validity of seizures, freezing, orders and of the consequential actions - The High Court found that the ED had followed the procedural requirements under the PMLA. The Deputy Director's reasons to believe were properly recorded, and the Assistant Director was duly authorized to conduct the searches and issue the freezing orders. The Court upheld the legality of the ED's actions, dismissing the petitioners' claims of procedural and authorization failures. - In conclusion, the Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition. en-us Thu, 16 May 2024 07:50:30 +0530 Thu, 16 May 2024 07:50:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77475 Money Laundering - Validity of seizures, freezing, orders and of the consequential actions - The High Court found that the ED had followed the procedural requirements under the PMLA. The Deputy Director's reasons to believe were properly recorded, and the Assistant Director was duly authorized to conduct the searches and issue the freezing orders. The Court upheld the legality of the ED's actions, dismissing the petitioners' claims of procedural and authorization failures. - In conclusion, the Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition. Highlights Money Laundering Thu, 16 May 2024 07:50:30 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77475